Budhi Arifin Noor, Dion Ade Putra, Oktaviati, Ridho Ardhi Syaiful, Rizky Amaliah, Mursid
Translator: Adrian Salim, Andrio Wishnu
Prabowo, Arnetta Naomi L. Lalisang, Julistian, Muliyadi, Sony Sanjaya,
Stefanny, Zamzania Anggia Shalih.
General Surgery Department, FKUI/RSCM,
Jakarta, Indonesia, May 2011.
CASE ILLUSTRATION
A
man, 43 years old came with complaint of burn injury 8 hours before hospital
admission. The patient was exposed to flame sparks on the face, body and both
upper trunk while working as a construction worker. Patient was holding steel
when the steel was exposed to electrical wires and caused fire. The patient was
unconscious for 5 minutes and taken to a private hospital, there patient
treated with MEBO, RL 1 kolf infusion, urinary catheters, anti-tetanus and
analgesics. The patient was then referred to the RSCM due to limited facility.
The
primary survey during physical examination was clear airway, spontaneous
breathing, vital signs was within normal limits, with GCS 15 (E4M6V5), and on
secondary survey there was found burn wounds on the face, neck and chest (see
local status). Other physical examinations were within normal limits with height 165 cm, and weight 62 kg. Laboratory tests result
showed hemoglobin level of 12.2 g / dL, hematocrit 35%, leukocytes 10,480 / ul,
82.2 fl platelets, albumin 2.2, random blood glucose 152 mg / dl, procalsitonin
16.06 and other laboratory results within normal result. The diagnosis for this
patient was second degree burn injury 37.5% wide.
Patient
was treated with fluid resuscitation (37.5 x 4 x 62) 9300 ml, 4650 ml within
the first 8 hours, and continued with 4650 ml in the next 16 hours and then
titrated until the urine output reached 0.5 to 1 ml / kg / hour. Patients were
also given co-amoksiklav injection of 3 x 1 gram, ketorolac injection of 3 x
300 mg, ranitidine injection of 3 x 150 mg, and vitamin E injection of 1 x 400
mg. Patients were then consulted to anesthesiologist for CVP installation.
After 1 day of treatment in the ER patients were then moved to the RSCM Burn
Unit.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Burn
injuries can be caused by fire, exposure to high temperature such as the sun,
electrocution, chemicals and radiation. Most of burn injuries admitted to RSCM
are caused by fire with 56% of the total case, 40% of boiling water, 3% of
electrocution and 1% of chemicals.5
I.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Areas of burn wounds are divided into three zones, which are coagulation zone, stasis zone and hyperemic zone.1,2
Areas of burn wounds are divided into three zones, which are coagulation zone, stasis zone and hyperemic zone.1,2
a. Coagulation zone
The tissue in this zone is irreversibly damaged during traumatic burn.
b. Stasis zone
There are moderate perfusion disturbances in the area surrounding the necrotic zone. In the stasis zone, there is vascular damage thus causes vascular leakage.
c. Hyperemic zone
The character of the hyperemic zone is vasodilatation due to
inflammation process.
Burn Injury Phases5
- Acute Phase / shock phase. The patients may experience disturbance in the airway, breathing and circulation.
- Sub-acute phase, which takes place after the shock phase is resolved. Lost or damaged tissue resulting from contact with the heat source will cause inflammatory process with exudation of plasma protein and infection that can cause sepsis.
- Late Phase occurred after wound closure until maturation. The problem that arises during this phase are scarring, contractures and deformities due to the fragility of tissue or structured organ.
II. DIAGNOSIS
a.
Total
burn surface area can be evaluated with:
i. Palmar
surface method : the patient’s palmar (including the fingers)
measured as 1% of Total Body Surface Area (TBSA).
ii. Wallace’s
Rule Of Nine
iii. Lund
and Browder charts: to measure body shape differences in patient
age and asses precise score in burn children.
b.
Age :
Infant, children, and adult
c.
Burn
Wound Depth
d.
Circumferential
Grade II and III Burn Injury cause blood flow restriction at
extremities, disturb respiration process if located at chest, therefore
escharotomy is needed.
Table 1. Classification of Burn Wound Depth in United States.3
III. BURN INJURY MANAGEMENT.4,6
Burn injury wound care could be divided into 3 major steps, which are
emergency/resuscitation phase, acute phase, and rehabilitation phase.
Table 2. Categorization of Burns.
|
- Acute/shock phase : to protect patient from the source of burn injury, ABC evaluation, evaluation of any other trauma, fluid resuscitation, urine catheter, nasogastric tube, vital sign and laboratory, pain management, tetanus prophylaxis, administration of antibiotics and wound care.
- Sub acute phase started when patient is hemodinamically stable. Management for acute phases: to prevent infection, wound care, and nutrition.
- Phase rehabilitation : to increase self-sufficiency through the achievement of improved full functionality.
III.1.
Fluid resuscitation.5,6
III.2.
Indication for fluid therapy
Grade
2 or 3 > 25% in adult, burn injury in the face with inhalation trauma and if
the patient can not drink. Whereas in children and elderly burn injury grade II
or III >15%, the intravenous fluid resuscitation is generally required.
- Baxter formula
Second day : coloid : 500-2000cc + glucose 5% to maintain the
fluid.
Half the fluid volume is given in the first 8 hours
and another halfis given in the next 16
hours.
III.3. Indications for
hospitalization
- Grade 2 over 15% in adults and over 10% in children
- Grade
2 on the face, hands, feet and perineum
- Grade
3 more than 2% in adults and every grade 3 in children
- Burns
with viscera trauma, bones and airway
III.4. Wound management.5,7
First burn wound should be washed with a solution of
dilute detergent (baby soap), debride
the skin that has been damaged. Dry the wound and apply
mecurochrom or silver sulfa diazine. In handling the wound required protective material
to create an optimal environment for wound healing, protect the wound from
bacteria, from the friction and absorb the exudat, this is what we called
dressing. There are many kinds of dressings, starting from the traditional
(honey) conventional/passive occlusive dressing (opened: mebo cream,
silversulfadiazine cream; closed: wet gauze, dry gauze, pembebatan) modern dressing/active occlusive dressing (absorbent cellulosic material, tulle grass
dressing and film
dressing).
IV.
DISCUSSION
In
this patient, the diagnosis of Burn injury Grade II A-B was upheld on the
grounds that the injuries occurred on dermis; there were blisters, and reddish
white colored injury that were very painful. Total burn surface area was 37,5%,
it was determined by Lund and Browder charts.
The patients treatment was consist of fluid resuscitation with baxter formula (TBSA x body weight (kg) x 4 cc (RL) in 24 hours), in this case, patient was given 9300 cc for 24 hours, divided into 4650 cc or 50% in the first 8 hours, then 4650 cc or 50% in the next 16 hours. Urine production is needed to be monitored in the resuscitation fluid because it describes the circulation of the fluid and the adequacy of fluid given. Nomally, urine production is 0.5 cc / kg / hour. Installation of CVP is indicated to monitor systemic circulation of fluid resuscitation and to access other solution.
First
Day
|
Wound dressing |
After
seventh day (1)
|
After
seventh day (2)
|
There
is no indication in giving antibiotic for burn injury patients, but this
patient was given injections of co-amoksiklav
3 x 1 gram. Analgesic is recommended in burn injury, in this case, the
patient was given intravenous ketorolac 3 x 300 mg. Indication for
hospitalization on these patients is second-degree burns over 15% and there
were wounds on his face and hands.
V. REFERENCES
- Gallagher JJ, Wolf SE, Herndon DN. Burns. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Editors. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 18th Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier. 2008.
- Gibran NS. Burns. In: Mulholland MW, Lillemoe KD, Doherty GM, Gerard M, Ronald V, Upchurch GR. Editors. Greenfield’s Surgery: Scientific Principles and Practice. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2006.
- Klein MB. Thermal, Chemical and Electrical Injuries. In: Thorne CH, Beasley RW, Aston SJ, Bartlett SP, Gurtner GC, Spear SL. Editors. Grab and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 6th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2007.
- Hettiaratchy S, Dziewulsky P. ABC Burns. BMJ 2004; 328: 1427-9.
- Reksoprodjo S dkk (ed). Kumpulan Kuliah Ilmu Bedah. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara Publisher.
- Herndon, David N. Total Burn Care 3rd edition. Saunders Elsevier.
- Grunwald TB, Garner WL. Acute Burns Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008(121):311.
Komentar ini telah dihapus oleh pengarang.
BalasHapusAlasan diberikannya antibiotik apakah untuk pencegahan sepsis atau bagaimana dok?
BalasHapusterimakasih
Terima kasih atas pertanyaannya. Alasan diberikannya antibiotic pada luka bakar dalam kasus ini adalah sebagai prophylaxis. Luka bakar adalah luka steril, dalam 3 hari pertama tidak ada invasi kuman. Pemberian prophylaxis antibiotic tergantung pada tempat pasien di rawat apakah sudah terjamin kebersihannya atau tidak. Apabila tempat pasien di rawat belum terjamin dapat mempertahankan luka bakar sebagai luka yang steril, maka sebaiknya tetap di berikan antibiotic. Pemilihan antibiotic prophylaxis mengikuti hasil pemeriksaan pola kuman di masing-masing RS (EBM). Demikian jawaban dari kami, semoga menjawab pertanyaan. Terima kasih.
Hapus